Comparison of the Interfacial Bond Strength Behaviour using Shear Key

Karan Shah, S.S.A.S.I.T, Surat, Gujarat, India; Rohit Tripathi ,S.S.A.S.I.T, Surat, Gujarat,India; Deval Master ,S.S.A.S.I.T, Surat, Gujarat,India; Abhay Yadav ,S.S.A.S.I.T, Surat, Gujarat,India

Bond slip, Jacketing, Retrofitting, Bond strength, Debonding, Specimen _N, Specimen _SK

Many of the existing reinforced concrete structures throughout the world are in urgent need of strengthening, repair or reconstruction because of deterioration due to various factors like corrosion, lack of detailing, failure of bonding between beam-column joints, increase in service loads, spalling, loss of strength, deflection, etc., Retrofitting techniques have changed the old scenario to construct the new structure always by demolishing the damaged one. Retrofitting is the modification of existing structures to make them more resistant to external force quantities. The objectives like higher loading requirements; damage by accidents and environmental conditions, rectification of initial design flaws, change of usage can be achieved by retrofitting. Though, retrofitting technique have many significant advantages, suffers from a limitation that sometimes can occur which is debonding and BOND SLIP. Thus in this paper, efforts have been made to identify the parameters which plays a major role for causing bond slip and solution have been tried to find out for limiting the same. In this paper efforts have been made to study the bond slip phenomenon in different variety of retrofitted specimen such as jacketed specimen without any bonding agent (Specimen _N) and jacketed specimen with SBR and shear key (Specimen _SK). After performing experiments, the bond strength was evaluated in both of the cases and has given satisfactory results.
    [1] Ariel D. Espeche, Javier Leon, “Estimation of bond strength envelopes for old to new concrete interfaces based on a cylinder splitting test”, Construction and building materials 25 (2011) 1222-1235. [2] P. PoluRaju, D. Tharun, C. V. MadhuBala, “Experimental Evaluation of Retrofitted Concrete Beams Using CFRP and GFRP”, International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering ISSN 0974-5904, Volume 04, No 06 SPL, October, pp. 812-818. [3] X.Z. Lu, J.G. Teng, L.P. Ye, J.J. Jiang, “Bond-slip models for FRP sheets/plates bonded to concrete”, Engineering Structures 27 (2005) 920-937. [4] B.V.Kumar, P Prakash,”Use of waste plastic in cement concrete pavement”. [5] N.,Lakshmanan, “Siesmic evaluation and retrofitting of buildings and structures”, ISET journal of earthquake technology 43 (2006) 31-48. [6] Giuseppe Oliveto, Massimo Marletta, “Seismic retrofitting of Reinforced concrete buildings using traditional and innovative techniques”, ISET journal of earthquake technology, Vol.42, No.2-3, June-Sept 2005, 21-46. [7] Kartini, K,Mahmud, H.B, Hamidah, M.S, “Strength properties of grade 30 rice husk ash concrete”, 31st conference on our world in concrete & structures: 16 - 17 august 2006, Singapore. [8] Gerardo M. Verderame, Paolo Ricci, Giovanni De Carlo, Gaetano Manfredi, “Cyclic bond behaviour of plain bars. Part I: Experimental investigation”, Construction and Building Materials 23 (2009) 3499–3511. [9] Tan Eng Slang, “Effect of coconut fiber and egg albumen in concrete for greener environment”, A report submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the bachelor degree of civil engineering. [10] E. Dehghani, F. Daneshjoo, A.A. Aghakouchak, N. Khaji, “A new bond-slip model for adhesive in CFRP - steel composite systems”, Engineering structures 34 (2012) 447-454. [11] Michael A. Colalillo, Shamim A. Sheikh, “Siesmic retrofit of shear-critical reinforced concrete beams using CFRP”, Construction and building materials 32 (2012) 99-109. [12] IS 456:2000 – Indian Standard Plain and Reinforced concrete – Code of Practice. [13] IS 383:1970 - Specification For Coarse And Fine Aggregates From Natural Sources For Concrete.
Paper ID: GRDCF001053
Published in: Conference : Recent Advances in Civil Engineering for Global Sustainability (RACEGS-2016)
Page(s): 426 - 431