A Comparative Study of Regular and Irregular Shaped RC Building Using Software-Aid
Ms.Vidhi M.Joshi, Road and Building Dept., Surat; Ms Khyati K.Choksi ,K.J Polytechnic, Bharuch; Mr.Shrenik K.Shah ,Road and Building Dept; Mrs.Kavita N.Choksi ,Shree Swami Aatmanand Saraswati Institute Of Technology, Surat
Configuration, Crumple section, Earthquake resisting structure, Irregularity, Symmetry
Configuration is very much important for good seismic performance of the building. To makes the structure having good aesthetics and functionally effective, both shape and structural system must be sound enough. The wide range of the damages observed during past earthquakes across the world due to poor configuration. A building with simple geometry in plan has performed well during strong earthquake with compare to complex shape as symmetry is maintained. When irregular shapes are included in a building, a higher level of engineering efforts is required to make the structure good earthquake resistant. In these paper ill effects of irregularity which includes Time period, axial load, bending moment, her force, and torsion is reduced to remarkable extent by providing crumple section, which converts an irregular E-shape building into regular one. A building is analyzed having regular and irregular shape under the effect of earthquake loading by using latest software Aid. Analysis make possible to plan an irregular structure even in earthquake prone areas.
-
[1] IS 4326:1993, “Earthquake Resistant Design and Construction of Buildings”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
[2] IS-1893-Part-1 (2000), “Criteria for Earthquake Resistance Design Of Structures”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
[3] C.V.R Murthy, Rupen Goswami A. R. Vijayanarayanan, Vipul V. Mehta.”Earthquake Behaviour Of A Buildings”, Gujarat State Disaster Management Authority Government Of Gujarat
[4] Jain Sudhir K., (Aug-2002), “Concept of Seismic Design and Configuration” Journal of Institution of Engineers (India) Vol.83.
[5] Arnold Christopher and Robert Reitherman “Configuration and Seismic Design”, John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA, 1982.
[6] Army, Navy And Air Force, Department Of (S. B. Barnes & Associates And John A. Blume & Associates, Consultants), “Seismic Design For Buildings” (The “Tri Services Design Manual”)(Washington, DC: Department Of The Army, April, 1973)
[7] Berg. Glen V., ”Design Procedures, Structural Dynamics And The Behavior Of Structures In Earthquakes”, U.S. Nation Conference On Earthquake Engineering (1975)
[8] Degenkolb, Henry J.”Earthquake Forces On Tall Structures” (Bethlehem Steel, 1970).
[9] 7 Dowrick, David J.,” Earthquake Resistant Design” (London: John Wiley & Sons, 1977).
[10] Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Learning From Earthquake: “Planning And Field Guides” (Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 1977).
[11] Engle, H. M., “The Earthquake Resistance of Buildings from the Underwriter’s Point Of View,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 19, No.2 (June 1929).
[12] Hauf, Hold D., “Minimizing Earthquake Hazards: Ii Architectural Factors,” Aia Journal (July 1968).
[13] Folyakov, S.“Design of Earthquake Resistance Structures” (Moscow: Mir Publishers, 1974).
[14] 12 Prendergast, J. D., And Fisher, W. S., “Seismic Structural Design/Analsis Guidelines” (D. S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, February 1977).
[15] Shah, Haresh C., Sutty, Theodre C., and Padilla, Luis,” The Purpose and Effect or Earthquake Codes,” Internal Study Report No. 1 (John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering, August 1977).
[16] Unesco Working Group On “The Principles Of Earthquake Resistant Design”, Intergovernmental Meeting On Seismology Ans Earthquake Engineering, Paris, April 21-30, 1964.
[17] Raúl González Herrera1 And Consuelo Gómez Soberón,”Influence Of Plan Irregularity Of Buildings”
Paper ID: GRDCF001107
Published in: Conference : Recent Advances in Civil Engineering for Global Sustainability (RACEGS-2016)
Page(s): 339 - 345
Published in: Conference : Recent Advances in Civil Engineering for Global Sustainability (RACEGS-2016)
Page(s): 339 - 345